Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘US’ Category

In case you missed it, the abbreviated synopsis:

On Economy:

Obama: appealed to the middle class by using the word middle-class frequently, promising to make tax cuts and take decisive action – particularly against those people living high on the hog. He confused the words investor and taxpayer, perhaps to make us feel less screwed by the bailout plan. Although he recently took McCain to task for implying the fundamentals of the economy are strong, he expressed confidence in our ability to turn things around – not because the fundamentals are not strong. Obama’s confidence is derived from his magic hopeychangy pixie dust. Everyone can have magic hopeychangey pixie dust – except the rich people. Screw them. They have too much money anyway.

McCain invaded the personal space of audience members: one can only hope he didn’t have bad breath. Yuck. He proposed nationalizing home mortgages, which flipped me out as much this time as it did when Biden said it last Thursday. He might name one of the many qualified Americans as Secretary of the Treasury – maybe Meg Whitman of E-Bay… the middle class digs E-bay. Besides, the secretary needs to be somebody who Americans identify with immediately and say, we can trust that individual… so if not Meg Whitman, then maybe Tom Hanks or Bill Cosby?

McCain failed miserably at pretending to understand the middle class – although he did express the opinion that American Workers are innovative exporters and importers and, uh, some other word he can’t recall. Seriously, some of his best friends are American Workers and if they’re given a chance to work, everything will straighten out. He almost got one-up on Obama regarding the potential tax burdens his economic plan would place on small businesses. Obama countered by noting “only a few percent of small businesses” would be affected.

Tom Brokaw: Well, look, guys, the rules were established by the two campaigns, we worked very hard on this. So, when we have a discussion, it really is to be confined within about a minute or so.

Me to the Television: Wait. What is a few percent? Come Back…. this applies to those making $250,000 net profit annually? Right? That is net? Is that NET? Tom… go back to the that topic… Damn you Tom!

Why are We in This Mess and How do we get out of this mess?

McCain: We’re in this mess because Obama loves Frannie (sic) and Freddie, big spending and higher taxes… but, McCain, My Friends, would cut discretionary spending and lobbyists, buy bad mortgages and stuff because he’s a reformer. Look at his record. He has reached across the aisle to Democrats and once even pinched Joe Lieberman on the butt he likes him so much. That’s how bipartisan he is. Oh, and did he mention Obama loves earmarks and taxes!

Obama: Claims the problem we face now are the result of the failed policies of the last 8 years- thanks to McCain’s friend Bush, and McCain’s party, which is the Bush Party… you know, the party that has been in Washington with Bush all by themselves for the last eight years. The fix is we need to stop reacting to these problems and start anticipating them through use of our American psychic powers. Oh, and did he mention McCain loves Bush’s spending and his big deficit – unlike Clinton, who had a surplus. (Omitting unforeseen expenses during Bush administration – such as war, DHS funding, cities leveled by hurricanes, tornadoes and terrorist attacks, and some more war – all of which can get costly.)

McCain: Bush who?

Tom: I want to just remind you one more time about time. You may not have noticed, but we have lights around here. They have red and green and yellow and they are to signal… you are not obeying the debate control devices!

Prioritizing:

Tom: Health policies, energy policies, and entitlement reform, what are going to be your priorities in what order?

McCain says: What were those priorities again Tom? Nevermind, we can do it all, My Friend. We know how to do it, My Friends. I have the fixes. I’ve just been saving them all up for when I am President, My Friends.

Obama says we will have to prioritize and that $4 per gallon gas is an opportunity… So, we’ll fix energy the same way the government invented computers… (he meant how Al Gore created the internet.) He kinda sorta knows how to achieve energy independence but not exactly – it’s like when “JFK said we’re going to the Moon in 10 years, nobody was sure how to do it, but we understood that, if the American people make a decision to do something, it gets done.” It’s the hopeychangy pixie dust. Ya’ll wouldn’t understand.

Oh, and by the way, health care is a right and Obama will cure cancer.

Use of United States combat forces in situations where there’s a humanitarian crisis, but it does not affect national security:

Obama says “Well, we may not always have national security issues at stake, but we have moral issues at stake.” This was not the case in Iraq. See, people just misunderstood Saddam because of the mustache. He gassed them because his feeling were hurt. Plus, we were already busy in Afghanistan. So, McCain and Bush were wrong on Iraq. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. It was bad judgment. McCain was Bush’s cheerleader. He loves Bush’s bad judgment of the last 8 years.

McCain says: Our humanitarian efforts must be “tempered with our ability to beneficially affect the situation,” which means he doesn’t mind using the military as peacekeepers – as long as we’re fairly certain we can kick some ass and win. We will not leave in dishonorable defeat.

Tom: The time… I… If we could… whatever. I’m just the hired help here, so, I mean…

Other Foreign Policy Issues:

Pakistan, Iran, Russia

Obama says: Kill Osama. Crush Al Qaeda. Get tough with use of diplomacy, sanctions, international support and military force. I’ll say the same thing that John said on Russia, except better… And nobody said we were invading Pakistan. “What I said was if Pakistan is unable or unwilling to hunt down bin Laden and take him out, we should.” But we’re not invading it.

McCain says: Senator Obama is dangerous because he’d talk without preconditions and send a telegraph announcing his military plans. Teddy Roosevelt used to say walk softly — talk softly, but carry a big stick. Sen. Obama likes to talk loudly – whereas I’d secretly have my Veep sneak up on our enemies and shoot them in the back with her moose gun. Especially Putin. She can site him from her backyard.

Obama: This is the guy who sang, “Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran,” who called for the annihilation of North Korea. That I don’t think is an example of “speaking softly.”

Closing Remarks:

Obama says: Michelle and I grew up poor. We are average Americans. I am an obedient husband, who was raised by the sensitive white women you see on my infomercials. I’m not scary at all.

McCain says: Well, my father was absentee-er than yours… and he was off serving his country. So, I was raised by women too – and I’m a veteran. You’re not. I am. Therefore, I’m asking the American people to give me another opportunity to serve. Please. Pretty please.

Tom: ” That concludes tonight’s debate from here in Nashville. It’s time to say good… you’re in my way of my script there, if you will move. I CANNOT SAY GOODBYE WITHOUT MY SCRIPT!”

McCain: So, Barry, do you think I could have a spot in your administration?

Obama: I don’t think so.

McCain: Well, can I go party with you at the Gore Mansion?

Obama: No John, I don’t think that’s a good idea.

Conclusion: There’s a national conspiracy to make Obama the next President of the United States – and the Republicans are in on it.

Read Full Post »

Congress has passed legislation authorizing $700 billion in government money to shore up the nation’s stressed financial industry. The 263-171 vote by the House sends the Senate-passed version to the White House for President Bush’s signature.

UPDATED: Tennessee Roll Call: Blackburn, David Davis, Lincoln Davis, Duncan voting no. Cooper, Cohen, Gordon, Tanner and Wamp voting yes.

Read Full Post »

Debate Analysis

Dear Republicans:

We’re screwed.

A.

Read Full Post »

When the Obama campaign bought up Google ads on searches such as “Obama muslim” “Obama Islam” and “Obama birth certificate” – I thought, ‘Hey, what an effective way to fight a smear campaign! He’s so smart and high-tech!”‘

When anti-Obama blogs were locked-down by Google, I was a little uncomfortable, but then I thought, ‘There’s no way Obama could organize such an effort.  It’s probably a glitch…’

When Barack Obama’s campaign sent out threatening letters to block this smear ad from networks and requested that the Department of Justice launch an investigation, again I was uncomfortable but I thought `Well, Harold Simmons is eccentric (this is what they call crazy people who are also excessively rich) and a known swift-boat backer, so I can understand why Obama’s campaign over-reacted.

But Obama threatening the licenses of TV stations that run NRA ads? Well, Instapundit and The Bitch Girls say it’s so and have documentation to prove it.  ADD to this, the Governor of Missouri had to issue a statement on alleged plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.

Is this a preview of the change Obama promises to bring? Be nice or be arrested, locked-down, intimidated, threatened or otherwise silenced?  If he can’t take the heat now, what happens when he’s elected to the kitchen?

Folks, at this point, I’ve moved way beyond discomfort, and I have no excuses left.  I’d go buy one of Tam‘s “No Thanks, Keep the Change” merchandise… if only it hadn’t gotten pulledtwice because it might have infringed on trademark and copyright policies.  (Copyright infringement will only be condoned if logo is used in support of the Obama campaign.)

Anyway, here’s the NRA ad, which inspired the team of Obama attorneys to go forth and write nasty letters. As you will see, it’s very different from Obama’s ads, which are ever so truthful.

Read Full Post »

Over at TriCities.com, Gary Gray from the Herald Courier has a quaint story about Obama’s unscheduled stop at the Pop Ellis Soda Shoppe & Grill in Abingdon, VA.

Gray reports:

[Obama] then leaned back and yelled over his shoulder to staff members who had filtered off the bus and into the business: “You guys want something?”

The yelling wasn’t an intentional discourtesy but necessary so he could be heard over the cackle and buzz.

At first, I thought it was odd Gray felt it necessary to point out Obama wasn’t being impolite by using his outdoor voice inside. Then, I remembered… people do tend to work themselves into a tizzy over the silliest things. As a matter of fact, right this very moment, people are going nuts over the McCain ad, which features Obama using the “You can put lipstick on a pig” line.

Good grief people. The phrase has been around for quite some time. In fact, my grandmother used it frequently when talking about politicians, the local butcher and the TVA. It simply means you can dress something up and try to make it look good – but underneath it’s still the same as it always was… whether this be dishonest, dangerous, ugly, unfit, full of fat and gristle or somehow otherwise bad.

So, I think we’re making mountains out of molehills here. Then again, I suppose I’m no different because I got hung up on this portion of the Herald Courier story:

“That looks good – you going to eat all that?” [Obama] asked Lindsey Short, who was finishing up her meal. “How you doing – you want a picture? Nice to meet you.”

Short said she had “no clue” she was going to meet Obama on Tuesday.

“I came down here with a friend from Richlands to work on a project at King College,” she said. “We were in here, and all of a sudden security guys came over to us to search us. It’s really exciting.”

Humph! I assume the Secret Service had to search every single one of those Pop patrons, which would only be exciting or worthwhile if you had some desire to see Obama, which I don’t. Therefore, I’d have found the ordeal of being patted down to be in his presence intrusive and annoying. Then, “that looks good – you going to eat all that?” What was that? Was he planning to filch the fries or was he calling her fat by insinuating she shouldn’t eat all of the food? Good lord, you could get stabbed in the hand with a fork for comments like that around here.

Of course, I realize those people were probably thrilled to have an opportunity to meet Obama. I understand that. I do. As Smartypants says, Obama is historical and stuff. I’m just sayin’ – as a person, who’d prefer a pig in lipstick over a pig in a poke – I might’ve found the whole thing a little rude. That’s all.


Read Full Post »

Am I the only person who thinks that spending 3 million dollars to ready the Belmont campus for a Presidential Debate is crazy? I understand wanting the bathrooms to be clean and the need to create a place to park the media… but 3 million dollars?

Think of all the things you could buy with three million dollars. I thought of designer shoes, fishing lures and beer – but hey, I’ve never claimed to be righteous and noble in my thoughts. So you imagine instead scholarships, lab equipment, new technology… or poor, starving children and homeless folks.

A few years from now, do you think anyone is going to look back and say: “Oh My Gosh, remember that presidential debate in 2008 or was it 2007? You know – the one at that college in Tennessee where Obama debated… um… that older white guy he was running against… uh… the one who picked that Sarah Palin lady from Alaska to be his running mate…. oh what was his name? Well, I can’t remember his name. But anyway… I remember the college campus and that banner and those marigolds were Fab-U-lous!’

Read Full Post »

Remember when the news had to be factual and unbiased? Yeah, okay. Me neither, but I do remember when readers or viewers had the ability to distinguish between fact and fiction.

This doesn’t seem to be the case anymore.

What many of us accept as news these days is a hodgepodge of fact, speculation, opinion, and repeats of those aforementioned things, which can be repeated because it is attributed to another source.  Of course, we blame this situation on “The Media,” which is ridiculous, particularly since this tends not to be a term used to describe a profession but an insulting misnomer lumping a very diverse group people practicing a profession into a teeming mass identical in characteristics and thus worthy of scorn – you know like “Killer Bees” or “maggots.”

The truth is the news, like any other market, is consumer driven. If The People have steered the market right to the edge of Weekly World territory, well then, that’s where we wanted to go. The problems only arise when those who think aloud expect consumers to be smart enough to know – based on format, position, banner, disclaimer or frequent use of political labels or the word asshat – which is which and what is what.

And some just aren’t.

Some confuse opinion for fact and fact with fiction either because they can’t tell the difference or they are looking for information to support a pre-existing viewpoint. Others – well, their opinions change and perceptions shift as the facts are altered. And even those of us who know better and understand that “information masquerading as fact can be fickle” feel pressured to make snap judgments – then put it out there because it’s a “current issue”.  Of course, once out there with all of the true, false and unsubstantiated, the facts get harder to find.

I’ve been asked countless times for my opinion on Sarah Palin or when I might “blog about the candidate, the rumors, etc.” Well, I haven’t formed an opinion yet. I don’t know enough about Sarah Palin to offer up an accurate assessment of who she is or what she offers the Republican party besides a bra.  I have first impressions being: She’s not polished. She’s unaccustomed to the national stage. Damn, she’s so conservative she makes Aunt Ethel seem liberal.  (Wait! Should lack of political shine be refreshing? Or like most Americans, do I expect politicians to put on a show – even as I complain about the insincerity, dishonest nature and need for showmanship in politics? Yes, I think I do. Yikes. Does this mean I won’t vote for anyone who didn’t write a cheesy autobiography? I hope not.)

As for the other “news” – I don’t want to read attacks or commentary about her parenting. I’m a mother too. I happen to know the job comes with more than its fair share of critics. In fact, it’s one of the few professions in world where you are damned if you do, damned if you don’t – because the entire world feels entitled to grade your performance.  If Palin waterboards her children or parents in some way that would reveal dark corners of her character – tell me this. Otherwise, I am willing to skip the nasty comments over at Huffington Post about the baby being up past bedtime during the convention, which is the baby who is rumored not to be her baby and not the baby who’s having a baby.  I can also do without information from the daughter’s boyfriend’s myspace or facebook page – unless he’s up for a White House position. I don’t care about allegations that she vacuums the carpet against the nap or vice versa – you know whichever way is bad.

Likewise I haven’t pondered overmuch on if she’s too old to have that hairstyle (which is described as the “Barracuda Look” in this article picked up by Huff – one which also suggests the author is 90% certain the eyeglasses are a prop, despite the fact Palin wore glasses as a child – which just goes to show 10% bites you in the ass every time.)

But again – I don’t care. It’s not like foreign counties, terrorists or domestic enemy forces (such as Don Wildmon) are going to be sitting around saying, “What? Attack America(ns)! We can’t do that. I mean have you not seen their VPs hair! It’s gorgeous!”

As a voter, I want to know the facts about her actions as a public official. I’m interested in the Gary Lundgren deal and the findings of the trooper incident.  I am not interested in exaggerated tales of her push for creationism in schools (um, hello Tennessee?) the books she banned (as appeared in the community blogs portion of Obama’s website and was later removed) although some of the books on the list weren’t printed when she allegedly banned them.  And oh yes, I do love it that Palin’s nomination is enough of a threat that it’s caused Obama to drop the righteous act. He’s no longer playing the ever-patient smeared-online martyred candidate, who floats along the high road while pleading for love, peace, hope, change, kindness, harmony, joy and Skittles candy for all. He’s throwing his own punches now – and in doing so, looks less perfect, different and beautiful than he once did. At least, I no longer smell cotton candy and expect a choir to start singing about rainbows and butterflies in the middle of his speaking engagements. For this I am grateful.

Otherwise, as millions of reporters and bloggers attempt to understand the politics and players of another state in 15 minutes or less – the truth about Sarah Palin is a work in progress. And contrary to what the Dems think: I won’t dislike her because her teenage daughter is like other teenage daughters across America. Contrary to what the GOP seems to think: I won’t embrace her just because she has *girl parts.

For now I’m content to sit back, let others unearth the information, toss it out there, have Les Jones fact-check them, and then after the dust settles and we have the VP debates, I’ll figure out if Palin is a good pick. And I’ll let you know.

 

Read Full Post »

Smartypants says: “Uncle J said Obama was historical.”
I say: “Yes. He’s the first black nominee for President. That’s never happened before.”
Smartypants says: “So his nomicanation is historical.”
I say: “Yes.”
Smartypants says: “Well, I didn’t think he was historical because you have to be old to be historical like the buildings in town.  And Obama looks college-aged or Mr. Price’s@School’s age – and I don’t think he’s old either.  Maybe 20.”

Pause.

Smartypants says: “So, which team nominated him?”
I say: “You mean party. The Democratic Party.”
Smartypants says: “Is Uncle J. a Democratic?”
I say: “Yes.”
Smartypants says: “Well, Uncle J said he wasn’t voting for him no matter how black he was.”
I say: “Uncle J said that?”
Smartypants says: “Yeah, because Obama never served anywhere but in a fancy office: he wasn’t a army man like Uncle J was.  Uncle J said he’s just a slick-talking pansy-butt.  But Uncle J used the other word. You want me to say it?”
I say: “No.”
Smartypants says: “It starts with an A- and end with an S- and has another S-.”
I say: “I know the word.”
Smartypants says: Uncle J said black solidcarry doesn’t matter if you’re blowed up by Russia and he’d druther pick that lady who eats rice.”
I say: “We’re not getting blown up by Russia. There is no lady who eats Rice.   You need to stop listening to your Uncle J. He’s that word that starts with an A- and ends with an S- and he’s crazy.”
Smartypants says: “I’m telling him you said that.”
I say: “I’ll give you a dollar if you do.”

Pause.

Smartypants says: “So I guess there’s a lot of White People on the Democrat team.”
I say: “What?”
Smartypants says: “Well, they could have nominated a regular black guy.  Then, he would have won and that would be even more historical, but White People probably don’t want to be too historical all at once you know.”
I say: “Did Uncle J tell you that?”
Smartypants says: “No, I knowed that myself.”
I say: “I see.”

Smartypants says: “When I run, I’m going run `publican. So they can’t stop me.”

Read Full Post »

Democrats on Tax Reform: “They say they’re not going to take any water out of your side of the bucket, just the other side of the bucket.”

Heh.

Read Full Post »

A Different Kind of War

A unit of the Tennessee Army National Guard is heading to the Horn of Africa.

The unit of 13 soldiers will head to Djibouti and possibly other areas to drill for water in a remote regions of the Horn, said Sgt. 1st Class Michael Lyon. A guard member for almost 30 years, Lyon also is the detachment commander, the units’s highest-ranking member. The date for deployment to the Horn has not yet been determined, he said.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.